Abstract
Introduction: the aim of this study was to assess return to sport of patients after hip arthroscopy for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI).
Method: patients with sports activity prior to surgery and who underwent hip arthroscopy due to FAI syndrome, with minimum follow-up of two years were included. All patients had to complete a written survey about type of sports they performed, sports return, competition level and satisfaction with surgery. Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) was assessed, and level of sport activity was registered, according to Tegner’s Activity Scale.
Results: one hundred and four hip arthroscopies were available for full analysis with minimum follow-up of 29.4 (24 – 46) months. We observed ninety-six (92.3%) patients were able to return to same prior sports activity at a mean of 4.7 (range 2 – 9) months. Eight (7.7%) patients were unable to return to sports after surgery. 95.2% reported agreement with hip surgery. mHHS score showed an statistically significant increase after surgery (69.2 ± 4.8 versus 87.5 ± 4.4; p <0.05). There was no significant difference in Tegner’s Activity Scale.
Discussion: several authors sustain that patients with recreational sports activity who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAI syndrome, achieve excellent outcomes, and able to return to their prior level of competition with a high rate of satisfaction. Our results are similar, according with literature.
Conclusion: FAI treatment with arthroscopy achieves high rates of satisfaction and sports return, with similar competition level before surgery.
Todo el material publicado en el Revista Artroscopia está cedido a la Asociación Argentina de Artroscopia (AAA). De conformidad con la Ley de Derecho de Autor (Ley 11.723), al autor correspondiente de cada manuscrito se le pedirá que complete un formulario de cesión de derechos de autor sobre la aceptación del manuscrito. Al enviar un artículo el autor(es) debe hacer una declaración completa al editor sobre todas las presentaciones e informes previos que pudieran considerarse como publicación previa o duplicada del mismo trabajo o muy similares. Copias de dicho material debe ser incluido en el documento presentado para ayudar al editor a decidir cómo tratar el asunto.