¿Existen discrepancias entre la planificación preoperatoria y la evaluación intraoperatoria realizada por el cirujano en la artroplastia total de rodilla con asistencia robótica?

Abstract

Introduction: there is little evidence regarding the concordance between the preoperative plan using robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty and that after the prosthetic balance by the surgeon. Our aim is to evaluate the level of agreement between the preoperative planning of total knee arthroplasty with semiactive robotic assistance (Mako) and the planning made by the orthopedic surgeon during the surgery.

Materials and methods: descriptive study of prostheses installed between October 2018 and June 2019 with preoperative planning performed by the MAKOplasty® software. This was compared with intraoperative planning by the Orthopedic Surgeon. Variables analyzed: coronal and sagittal alignment, rotation and size of the components and insert. The data was analyzed with the STATA v.16.0 software. A qualitative univariate descriptive analysis was performed, with a 95% confidence interval.

Results: fifty-one operated knees from forty-nine patients were included, 69% were women. The level of agreement was: Femoral component: axial 86.3% [CI = 73.7 - 94.2], coronal 88.2% [CI = 76.1 - 95.5], sagittal 88.2% [CI = 76.1 - 95.5]. Tibial component: axial 98% [CI = 89.5 - 99.9], coronal 96.1% [CI = 86.5 - 99.5], sagittal 96.1% [CI = 86.5 - 99.5]. Component size: femur 94.1% [CI = 83.7 - 98.7], tibia 84.3% [CI = 71.4 - 92.9], insert 27.4% [CI = 15.8 - 41.7].

Conclusion: preoperative planning through the use of Mako semiactive robotic assistance presents a good level of agreement with that planned intraoperatively, with the exception of the insert size. The orthopedic surgeon is decisive in modifying the preoperative plan.