Reparación artroscópica de lesiones pequeñas y medianas del manguito rotador. Técnica quirúrgica y resultados
Resumen
Introduction: this study describes the technique and results of arthroscopic repair of small and medium-sized rotator cuff tears in a philanthropic hospital linked to an educational institution.
Materials and methods: we assessed fifty-seven patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery to treat complete rotator cuff tears (<3 cm) from January to December 2014 (mean age: 54.7) and were followed for at least two years (mean follow-up time: 147 weeks).
Cases evaluated with the UCLA Shoulder Rating Scale after at least two years of follow-up were classified as poor in 1.8% of cases, 15.8% as fair, 52.6% as good, and 29.8% as excellent. Average preoperative and postoperative UCLA scores were 12.4 and 31.7, respectively. Mean values for pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) also improved significantly, from 8.6 to 1.9.
Results: for patients over age fifty-five, age was positively associated (r = 0.577) with a greater difference in VAS score between preoperative and postoperative evaluations; in other words, older patients experienced less pain after at least two years of follow-up.
Conclusion: arthroscopic repair yielded good and excellent results in 82.4% of cases with at least two years of follow-up, especially for patients in the 55+ age group. The technique described proved effective for treating these types of tears, as well as a good low-cost option.
Derechos de autor 2021 Asociación Argentina Artroscopia

Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Todo el material publicado en el Revista Artroscopia está cedido a la Asociación Argentina de Artroscopia (AAA). De conformidad con la Ley de Derecho de Autor (Ley 11.723), al autor correspondiente de cada manuscrito se le pedirá que complete un formulario de cesión de derechos de autor sobre la aceptación del manuscrito. Al enviar un artículo el autor(es) debe hacer una declaración completa al editor sobre todas las presentaciones e informes previos que pudieran considerarse como publicación previa o duplicada del mismo trabajo o muy similares. Copias de dicho material debe ser incluido en el documento presentado para ayudar al editor a decidir cómo tratar el asunto.