Español
Abstract
Introduction: the purpose of this study was to report the functional results, return to sport, consolidation rate and complications in young athletes with a previous failed Latarjet surgery, treated with an autologous iliac crest graft.
Materials and methods: between 2017 and 2020, twelve patients with recurrent glenohumeral instability were operated on at our institution after previous failed stabilization with Latarjet surgery with autologous iliac crest graft as revision surgery. Functional evaluation was performed with the Rowe score, the VAS, and the ASOSS score. We evaluated the percentage of return to sport, the level reached, and the time it took the athletes to compete again. Bone consolidation and the adequate position of the graft were evaluated in all cases with front and profile X-rays of the shoulder and computed tomography with 3D reconstruction. Complications and revisions were recorded.
Results: the average follow-up was 42.6 months (range 24 to 92 months). The Rowe score, visual analog scale, and ASOSS were significantly improved after surgery (p <0.1). Nine patients returned to sport, eight of them at the same level. The bone graft consolidated in all patients. There were no recurrences. No complications were reported.
Conclusion: autologous iliac crest grafting is a valid option for the treatment of athletes with recurrent glenohumeral instability after previous failed stabilization with a Latarjet procedure.
Copyright (c) 2024 Asociación Argentina Artroscopia
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Todo el material publicado en el Revista Artroscopia está cedido a la Asociación Argentina de Artroscopia (AAA). De conformidad con la Ley de Derecho de Autor (Ley 11.723), al autor correspondiente de cada manuscrito se le pedirá que complete un formulario de cesión de derechos de autor sobre la aceptación del manuscrito. Al enviar un artículo el autor(es) debe hacer una declaración completa al editor sobre todas las presentaciones e informes previos que pudieran considerarse como publicación previa o duplicada del mismo trabajo o muy similares. Copias de dicho material debe ser incluido en el documento presentado para ayudar al editor a decidir cómo tratar el asunto.